Melting Pot or Civil War?

July 15, 2018
A vigorous, controversy-courting argument for limiting immigration, especially of low-skilled workers.Salam (co-author: Grand New Party: How Conservatives Can Win the Working Class and Save the American Dream, 2008), the son of Bangladeshi immigrants who is now the executive editor of the National Review, delivers a nuanced case for closing the border to all but a certain desired class of newcomers and restructuring immigration policy in order to stave off ever increasing Balkanization. By his account, when low-skilled immigrants arrive in America, they are shunted off to second-class status and not expected to take their part in a melting-pot ideal that has become more a series of separate-but-not-equal enclaves. Donald Trump and company are capitalizing on that separation in forging a racially and ethnically tinged nationalism. Their opposition, to which he himself seems opposed, notwithstanding, Salam reckons on the possibility of a future in which "we might even have to countenance the creation of a new class of guest workers who would be permanently barred from citizenship." As it is, he argues, second-generation Americans are often at the barricades leading the fight against the gentrification of their run-down neighborhoods, foot soldiers in a race-based struggle over inequality that itself is a repudiation of the melting-pot ideal. The author's suggestion that immigrants be denied "the myriad...benefits for which low-income households are eligible" is among the more tendentious possibilities, while the scenario of wealthy Americans' replacing air conditioners with "a rotating cast of earnest young people who would be willing to fan them around the clock" is absurd but makes a point. Mostly, Salam ventures a hard but reasonable case. Allowing that some level of amnesty is likely to be required as a compromise, and even endorsing the thought of a universal child benefit by way of welfare, he pushes for a skill-based visa that "gives some (slight) weight to family ties" and other reforms.An intelligent and reasoned take on what has become a third-rail issue.

COPYRIGHT(2018) Kirkus Reviews, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

July 30, 2018
National Review executive editor Reihan Salam is optimistic that a solution to the United States’ immigration crisis can be found, though it will require compromise and a rethinking of the role of immigrants in American society. The son of Bangladeshi immigrants, Salam (Grand New Party: How Conservatives Can Win the Working Class and Save the American Dream) speaks to the current immigration impasse from the perspective of a political conservative and a second-generation American. He draws attention to the extreme, false dichotomy between open borders and highly restrictive immigration that limits political debate on these issues. The real focus going forward, he writes, should be on how America treats its immigrants: the United States needs to work to ensure that immigrants assimilate into American society, treating them like free and equal citizens rather than “permanent strangers.” Currently, he argues, too little is done to lift immigrants out of poverty, which perpetuates a lack of upward mobility and solidifies racial and economic divides between citizens and immigrants. He offers ambitious solutions, such as “large-scale amnesty followed directly by resolute enforcement” of immigration laws, a rebalancing of admissions toward highly skilled immigrants, and the creation of a universal child benefit program to alleviate the economic demands on poor immigrant families. This well-researched analysis adds relevant possibilities to the immigration debate in the U.S.